Bard Hernia Mesh Lawyer Update
We are accepting Bard hernia mesh removal or revision cases.
Update Summer 2023: Bard hernia mesh lawsuits have been reset for trial as some cases are reaching settlements. That’s good news for injured claimants who have had jury trials delayed for years due to the global pandemic. We are working with c0-lead counsel in the Bard Hernia Mesh MDL and continue prosecuting hernia mesh cases for claimants injured by the medical devices. There are strict deadlines for medical product liability cases so contact us now so that we can calculate your statute of limitations and repose.
$4.8 Million Hernia Mesh Verdict
August 29, 2022: $4.8 million jury verdict was awarded to Paul Trevino, who was implanted with and injured by a Bard Ventralex hernia mesh. The mesh burrowed into Paul’s tissue, causing severe pain and inflammation, resulting in additional surgeries.
$225,000 Bard Hernia Mesh Verdict
April 15, 2022: A $225,000 jury verdict was awarded to Antonio Milanesi, who was implanted with and injured by a Bard Ventralex hernia mesh. The mesh was implanted during a hernia repair in 2007. Later, he developed an infection and bowel abscess caused by the mesh, requiring additional surgeries.
August 17, 2022: John Jackson was appointed by Judge Sargus as The Settlement Master to oversee resolution and settlement of all Bard Hernia Mesh claims.
May 15, 2023: The third Bard Hernia Mesh Bellwether case is set for trial. This case is close to a settlement agreement and may be resolved before trial. If resolved, the judge will set another bellwether case for the Fall of 2023 until the bellwether cases are tried in court or settled before trial.
Hernia Mesh Complications
Hernia mesh litigation involves mesh that has malfunctioned, causing painful complications requiring surgery to remove, revise or replace the hernia mesh with additional treatment and medication. Serious complications include: Chronic Pain, Abscesses, Infections, Adhesions to the bowel; Bowel blockages, Perforation of organs and tissues, Fistulas, Hernia Mesh erosion, Hernia Mesh rupture; Hernia Mesh shrinkage; Hernia Mesh migration; Hernia Mesh contracture; Wound dehiscence (separation of tissues); Hernia recurrence (as a result of hernia mesh migration and/or contracture).
CR Bard/Davol Hernia Mesh leads the hernia mesh market in the United States. MDL 2846 Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation was created and ordered before Chief Judge Edmund Sargus of Columbus, Ohio. Other mesh lawsuits include Ethicon Physiomesh, Covidien mesh, Atrium C-Qur mesh, Gore-tex mesh and Strattice mesh.
Bard Hernia Mesh Products
The Bard/Davol hernia mesh products we are currently investigating for acceptance criteria include:
- PerFix Plug
- PerFix Light Plug
- 3DMax Mesh
- 3DMax Light
- Bard (Marlex) Mesh Dart
- Marlex (AKA Flat Mesh
- Bard Mesh
- Kugel Hernia Patch
- Modified Kugel Hernia Patch
- Composix Kugel Hernia Patch
- Composix E/X
- Composix L/P
- Sepramesh IP
- Ventralex ST Patch
- Ventrio ST
- Ventralight ST
Hernia Mesh Revision/Removal
Qualifying hernia mesh lawsuit criteria:
In most states, medical records evidencing the original hernia repair surgery with mesh implanted after 2011 AND:
- Have developed adhesions, scar tissue, hernia recurrence, intestinal blockage, mesh migration, organ perforation and infection more than 30 days from the original hernia mesh implant surgery; and
- Have undergone or have scheduled hernia mesh revision or mesh removal surgery due to mesh complications.
There are statutes of limitations and statutes of repose which limit the time to file a medical device product liability claim. These deadlines require research into the states’ legislation and briefing the case law to interpret the time limits. In light of the statutes of repose in certain state product liability cases, we may not be able to accept certain cases as follows:
- If the mesh was implanted in Kentucky before 2015, we may not be able to accept the case.
- If the mesh was implanted in Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Nebraska, Ohio, Oregon or Tennessee, before 2014, we may not be able to accept the case.
- If the mesh was implanted in Florida, North Carolina or Washington before 2011, we may not be able to accept the case.
- If the mesh was implanted in Iowa, Texas or Wisconsin before 2008, we may not be able to accept the case.
The deadline calculations may require further research, so contact us to verify that your deadlines to file a claim have not yet passed.