Transvaginal mesh lawsuits for women injured
Transvaginal Mesh Settlements & Verdicts
Transvaginal mesh lawsuits for women injured by the mesh have been a mega mass tort with over 100,000 claimants. There have been multimillion dollar verdicts of significantly injured women damaged by the devices and many zero dollar verdicts, also. The verdicts, settlements, manufacturers, products, and jurisdictions follows:
Pelvic Mesh & Bladder Sling Verdicts
7/12: $5.5 million – Christine Scott – C.R. Bard Avaulta Plus – CA
2/13: $11.11 million – Linda Gross – Ethicon/JJ Prolift – NJ
8/13: $2 million – Donna Cisson – C.R. Bard Avaulta – MDL WV
2/14: 0 – Carolyn Lewis – Ethicon/JJ TVT-O – MDL WV
4/14: $1.2 million – Linda Batiste – Ethicon/JJ TVT-O – TX
7/14: 0 – Diane Albright – Boston Scientific Pinnacle – MA
8/14: 0 – Maria Cardenas – Boston Scientific Obtryx – MA
9/14: $3.27 million – Jo Huskey – Ethicon/JJ TVT-O – MDL WV
9/14: $73.465 million – Martha Salazar – Boston Scientific Obtryx – TX
11/14: $6.7+ million – Amal Eghnayem – Boston Scientific Pinnacle – MDL
FL
11/14: $6.7+ million – Margarita Dotres – Boston Scientific Pinnacle – MDL FL
11/14: $6.7+ million – Mania Nunez – Boston Scientific Pinnacle – MDL FL
11/14: $6.5+ million – Juana Betancourt – Boston Scientific Pinnacle – MDL FL
11/14: $5.25 million – Jeanie Blankenship – Boston Scientific Obtryx – MDL WV
11/14: $4.75 million – Chris Wilson – Boston Scientific Obtryx – MDL
11/14: $4.25 million – Carol Campbell – Boston Scientific Obtryx – MDL
11/14: $4.25 million – Jacquelyn Tyree – Boston Scientific Obtryx – MDL
2/15: Settled – Wise v. Bard in the MDL
3/15: Settled – Bellew v. Ethicon (Prolift) in the MDL;
5/15: Settled – Sanchez v. Boston Scientific (Pinnacle) – CA
3/15: $5.7 million – Coleen Perry – Ethicon/JJ Abbrevo sling – CA
5/15: $100 million – Deborah Barda v. Boston Scientific Pinnacle and Advantage Fit – DL
10/15: 0 – Carol Cavness v. Ethicon/JJ Prosima – TX
10/15: 0 – Martha Carlson v. Boston Scientific Uphold – NC
12/15: $12.5 million – Hammons v. Ethicon/JJ (Prolift) – PA
2/16: 0 – Sherrer v. Boston Scientific Solyx and Bard Align – MO
2/16: $13.5 – Carlino v. Ethicon/JJ (TVT) – PA
4/17: $20.0 million – Engleman v. Ethicon/JJ (TVT Secur) – PA
5/17: $2.16 million – Betz v. Ethicon/Prolift – PA
9/17: $57.1 million – Ebaugh v. Ethicon/JJ (TVT-Secur) – PA
3/18: $35 million – Kaiser v. Ethicon/JJ (Prolift) – IN
4/18: $68 million – McGinnis v. Bard – NJ
1/19: $41 million – Emmett v. Ethicon/JJ – PA
4/19: $120 million – McFarland v. Ethicon/JJ – PA
5/19: $80+ million – Mesigian v. Ethicon/JJ – PA
6/19: $500,000 – Dunfee v. Ethicon/JJ (Prolift) – PA
3/22: 0 – McBroom v. Ethicon/JJ (Prolift, TVT-Secur) – AZ
3/22: 0 – Shears v. Ethicon/JJ (TVT) – WV
4/22: $2.5 million – Redding v. Coloplast (Novasilk) – FL
7/22: 0 – Burris v. Ethicon/JJ (Prolift, TVT-Secur) – OH
10/22: 0 – Jarrett v. Ethicon/JJ (TVT-O) – AR
10/22: 0 – Richards v. Ethicon/JJ (TVT-O) – TX
12/22: 0 – Snowden v. Ethicon/JJ (Abbrevo) – TX
3/23: 0 – Benested v. Ethicon/JJ (2007 TVT-O, Prolift) – FL
5/23: 0 – Dandy v. Ethicon/JJ (TVT-O) – NJ
Many law firms stopped accepting cases after Judge Goodwin dismantled the TVM MDL Court in 2018. So many women have reached out expressing their feelings of abandonment by the medical and legal professionals. We hear you and are still accepting cases if the implant has been removed or revised within the past few years. Contact us now at carolyn@carolynstclair.com as there are statutes of limitation and statutes of repose that may limit the time you can file a claim. Medical evidence can be destroyed after a certain time period, so contact us now at 800-814-4540 for a free medical legal consultation.
